Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:18 am
by Dreamer
helmut wrote:The problem is that these guys have a high resolution but a small screen. Thus each pixel is very small and you can't see the icons right.
Olive wrote:8 and 9 are good IMO. Not sure if the inner frame is necessary though.
What about 8 without the grey square (inner frame)?
I agree.
What about my suggestions above (grey/black symbol...)?
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 9:27 am
by Lesmo16
Dreamer wrote:What about my suggestions above (grey/black symbol...)?
That wouldn't be consistent, because all other similar icons are framed text or framed symbol.
All black on simple white background.
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 6:11 pm
by helmut
Dreamer wrote:...I suggest to display:
- grey symbol if there is embedded thumbnail and "Use embedded thumbnail" is disabled
- black symbol if there is embedded thumbnail and "Use embedded thumbnail" is enabled
and of course:
- no symbol if there is no embedded thumbnail, even when "Use embedded thumbnail" is enabled
Sounds like a full-featured-all-inclusive-comfort-class solution. First we should see whether it is important for users to have the various information on embedded thumbnail, then we can think about introducing additional icons or variations of the existing ones. I suggest to keep it in 1.80 the way it is now and see what users demand for the next version.
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 8:01 pm
by helmut
Info symbol has been changed in RC4. Solved.