Clear identification for test versions

[helmut]

Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully functional version, which is definetely not the case.

[xnview]

Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully funcational version, which is definetely not the case.

Right

[JohnFredC]

For testing purposes, it would be great if we could see a sequential build number, too!

[oops66]

+1 for both suggestions

[oops66]

Done with the Linux MP 0.25 Version - Thank you Pierre