RC4: Lite fullscreen - slight delay between pics

Bugs and Issues in 1.82 Test versions which have been fixed and verified as resolved.

Moderators: helmut, XnTriq, xnview

User avatar
Lesmo16
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Lesmo16 »

Hacker wrote:Please add this feature. This would make lite fullscreen as usable as normal fullscreen for viewing images and at the same time speed up Preview in Browser, which mainly affects the new Filmstrip mode (layout 6).
Support!
Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand!
Danny
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by Danny »

xnview wrote:
Hacker wrote:xnview,
Currently fullscreen from browser mode doesn't support Read ahead/Cache behind.
And will it?
Perhaps
Well, it does make sense, right? I would also like to see that happen. To me it's expected behaviour.
Dreamer
XnThusiast
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm

Post by Dreamer »

Lesmo16 wrote:
Hacker wrote:Please add this feature. This would make lite fullscreen as usable as normal fullscreen for viewing images and at the same time speed up Preview in Browser, which mainly affects the new Filmstrip mode (layout 6).
Support!
Me too! I think it's very important, viewing large images is very annoying with a delay...
Danny
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by Danny »

So? Any word on this?
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Post by xnview »

Danny wrote:So? Any word on this?
Add in RC4
Pierre.
Danny
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by Danny »

Using fullscreen still takes much longer than switching pictures in the viewer. Try it with +500kB JPGs.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Post by xnview »

Danny wrote:Using fullscreen still takes much longer than switching pictures in the viewer. Try it with +500kB JPGs.
Do you have cache behind & read ahead?
And do you have options/Preview/High quality?
Pierre.
Danny
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by Danny »

xnview wrote:
Danny wrote:Using fullscreen still takes much longer than switching pictures in the viewer. Try it with +500kB JPGs.
Do you have cache behind & read ahead?
And do you have options/Preview/High quality?
Of course, caching is enabled.

I did have High Quality enabled in the Browser's preview options as you said though. Disabling that increased the speed significantly.

But this is unexpected to me since i have high quality activated for the viewer, too, and it's faster than the fullscreen (preview) nonetheless. Fullscreen even shows the hourglass during the switch - the viewer doesn't. So the viewer seems to be doing something quicker than the fullscreen preview.

That, and the browser's preview is ugly with high quality off.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Post by xnview »

Danny wrote:
xnview wrote:
Danny wrote:Using fullscreen still takes much longer than switching pictures in the viewer. Try it with +500kB JPGs.
Do you have cache behind & read ahead?
And do you have options/Preview/High quality?
Of course, caching is enabled.

I did have High Quality enabled in the Browser's preview options as you said though. Disabling that increased the speed significantly.

But this is unexpected to me since i have high quality activated for the viewer, too, and it's faster than the fullscreen (preview) nonetheless. Fullscreen even shows the hourglass during the switch - the viewer doesn't. So the viewer seems to be doing something quicker than the fullscreen preview.

That, and the browser's preview is ugly with high quality off.
Right it's strange, there is a delay. I'll take a look...
Pierre.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Post by xnview »

Danny wrote:But this is unexpected to me since i have high quality activated for the viewer, too, and it's faster than the fullscreen (preview) nonetheless. Fullscreen even shows the hourglass during the switch - the viewer doesn't. So the viewer seems to be doing something quicker than the fullscreen preview.
Could you send me a Private message with your email, i would like to send you a test version for cache?
Pierre.
Dreamer
XnThusiast
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm

Post by Dreamer »

xnview wrote:Could you send me a Private message with your email, i would like to send you a test version for cache?
You can send it also to me, I have the same problem.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 46255
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France
Contact:

Post by xnview »

Dreamer wrote:
xnview wrote:Could you send me a Private message with your email, i would like to send you a test version for cache?
You can send it also to me, I have the same problem.
Sent
Pierre.
Danny
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 5:09 pm

Post by Danny »

I just tried the version you sent me and there seems to be no speed difference anymore. Good job! ;)
Dreamer
XnThusiast
Posts: 4608
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:08 pm

Post by Dreamer »

Fixed in RC5.

Hacker could you retest please?

Edit: Never mind, Pierre+Danny+me=fixed for sure :)
Dreamer
Hacker
Posts: 242
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 9:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Post by Hacker »

;)
Confirmed fixed. A question, still - does it only work in lite fullscreen? Because a delay seems to be still there in Filmstrip layout for instance.

Roman
Locked