Clear identification for test versions

Bugs and Suggestions in XnView MP or XnConvert MP which have been resolved.

Moderator: XnTriq

User avatar
helmut
Posts: 8446
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 6:47 pm
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Clear identification for test versions

Post by helmut »

Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully functional version, which is definetely not the case.
User avatar
xnview
Author of XnView
Posts: 37621
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Post by xnview »

helmut wrote:Whenever there are alpha or beta versions available of XnView (Windows), one can clearly tell that it is a test version: In the title bar it says "XnView 1.97 RC1 (instable)" for example. For XnView MP the same should be done. Currently, people might think that XnView MP 0.21 is a stable and fully funcational version, which is definetely not the case.
Right
Pierre.
User avatar
JohnFredC
XnThusiast
Posts: 2010
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Sarasota Florida

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Post by JohnFredC »

For testing purposes, it would be great if we could see a sequential build number, too!
John
User avatar
oops66
XnThusiast
Posts: 2005
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:17 am
Location: France

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Post by oops66 »

+1 for both suggestions
XnViewMP Linux X64 - Debian - X64
User avatar
oops66
XnThusiast
Posts: 2005
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:17 am
Location: France

Re: Clear identification for test versions

Post by oops66 »

Done with the Linux MP 0.25 Version - Thank you Pierre
XnViewMP Linux X64 - Debian - X64