v.0.26.1 Exif-DateTimeOriginal shown wrong in some cases

*** Please report new bugs here! ***

Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview, Dreamer

Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:54 am
Location: Paderborn, Germany

v.0.26.1 Exif-DateTimeOriginal shown wrong in some cases

Post by KlausT »

According to the Exif-specification (http://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.pdf, pdf-page 36, paper-page 30), DateTimeOriginal represents "the date and time when the original image data was generated. ... When the date and time are unknown, all the character spaces except colons (':') may be filled with blank characters, ...".

DateTimeOriginal may differ from the DateTimeDigitized. Therefore, I checked XnViewMP's behaviour with respect to "old" and "uncertain" date stamps. ExifToolGUI does not accept blank characters in uncertain date stamps, therefore I inserted '00' instead, in conformity with the IPTC spec.

Exif-DateTimeOriginal can be formatted in XnViewMP's labels using the DateTaken tag. I tried several date stamps. My findings with WinXP are summarized in the following table.
This table summarizes some problems of XnViewMP to show DateTaken:
  • an empty DateTimeOriginal tag is treated as an "error" (line 2).
  • all date stamps before 1970-01-01 (the beginning of the epoque) are treated as an "error", regardless whether the date stamps are precise or "uncertain": the error condition (a procedure may return -1) is interpreted as a valid date (0xffffffff) and shown in DateTaken as 2106-02-07, which is the end of the unsigned 32bit-epoque.
  • precise date stamps until 2106-02-07 are shown correct; the date 2038-01-20 (the day after the end of the signed 32bit-epoque) seems to be no problem.
  • "uncertain" date stamps (indicated by '00') after 1970-01-01 will be "rounded down" (not a good idea...).
  • the day after the end of the unsigned 32bit-epoque (2106-02-08) starts over with 1970-01-01.
In all cases, both the Exif- and Exiftool-tab in XnViewMP's Info pane show the correct date stamp. It seems that the procedure to format DateTaken has been rewritten and uses an unsigned 32bit representation for the date/time-stamp instead of the ascii-string. Obviously, there are good reasons why the Exif- and the IPTC-specifications use ascii-strings for date/time-stamps.

XnView 1.97.x doesn't have any problems to show DateTaken. My suggestion is to go back to the previous implementation in v1.97.x.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Klaus (running Windows)
User avatar
Author of XnView
Posts: 43576
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
Location: France

Re: v.0.26.1 Exif-DateTimeOriginal shown wrong in some cases

Post by xnview »

Please check XnViewMP 0.30