Protecting the Alpha version
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
Protecting the Alpha version
<Moderator's note: This topic has been split from another topic>
What about some warning dialog on start "This is only alpha version..."?
XnView 1.82 alpha
What about some warning dialog on start "This is only alpha version..."?
XnView 1.82 alpha
Last edited by Dreamer on Mon Feb 20, 2006 4:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tha is a damn good idea. And it should be in all the beta/RC releases too.Dreamer wrote:What about some warning dialog on start "This is only alpha version..."?
XnView Tweak UI - Tool to customize your XnView beyond the regular XnView options.
UI-less Settings - Documentation of all the hidden settings in XnView.
XFAM - Tool to create and customize XnView file associations.
UI-less Settings - Documentation of all the hidden settings in XnView.
XFAM - Tool to create and customize XnView file associations.
they had "alpha" on the release name, and in the download pages you had several links, to stable and alpha version I think that's clear enaugh.
but yeah, it's ok if u dont want alpha versions to spread around like they were final versions.
Still it's a pretty good review, 5 out of 5 in everything, damn great!
I wouldn't call XnView perfect, but sure it's close!!!
but yeah, it's ok if u dont want alpha versions to spread around like they were final versions.
Still it's a pretty good review, 5 out of 5 in everything, damn great!
I wouldn't call XnView perfect, but sure it's close!!!
Ad decus et ad libertatem nati sumus
Aut haec teneamus aut cum dignitate moriamur
We could use tip.ini file for this purpose, in alpha/beta versions.ckv wrote:Tha is a damn good idea. And it should be in all the beta/RC releases too.Dreamer wrote:What about some warning dialog on start "This is only alpha version..."?
Another idea - add password to zip file, show this password only in "Alpha" forum. This forum should be just for registered users (I mean Alpha section only). It could help a bit too.
Not sure about this one.Dreamer wrote:We could use tip.ini file for this purpose, in alpha/beta versions.ckv wrote:Tha is a damn good idea. And it should be in all the beta/RC releases too.Dreamer wrote:What about some warning dialog on start "This is only alpha version..."?
I like the "ZIP file with password" idea. The password can be simple, e.g. "fortestingonly" for example. Those download portals that still want to provide the alpha have to repack all files, I guess this should prevent them from doing so. Also I think it's not so much the people running the download portals but some keen members/users that feed the download portals with news.Dreamer wrote:Another idea - add password to zip file, show this password only in "Alpha" forum. This forum should be just for registered users (I mean Alpha section only). It could help a bit too.
Most likely, password protected ZIP files will not be mailable any longer since spamfilters and virus scanners will reject it, but that should not be too bad.
Not sure about this or this?helmut wrote:Not sure about this one.Dreamer wrote:We could use tip.ini file for this purpose, in alpha/beta versions.ckv wrote: Tha is a damn good idea. And it should be in all the beta/RC releases too.
When some (e.g. Russian) sites will add Alpha version as stable, not Alpha version, normal user will never know that it is just alpha version for testing, since most users never check "about dialog". They could say "it's not good/stable... I don't like it". This warning dialog could solve this.
I don't like using tip.ini. For Pierre showing/hiding the dialog should be as simple as possible, I'd prefer an extra dialog. Might be a bit annoying for testers, though.Dreamer wrote:Not sure about this or this?helmut wrote:Not sure about this one.Dreamer wrote: We could use tip.ini file for this purpose, in alpha/beta versions.
When some (e.g. Russian) sites will add Alpha version as stable, not Alpha version, normal user will never know that it is just alpha version for testing, since most users never check "about dialog". They could say "it's not good/stable... I don't like it". This warning dialog could solve this.
Why not go for the password protected ZIP archive?
Note:
The above said applies for Alphas, Betas and RCs.
Therefore I want to use .ini file, in alpha version this ini is missing, but we can place it there. We can create it and Pierre would just add this file to zip. We could just add this warning as first tip or remove all others and use just this "warning tip". Try this - create any txt file with following text and rename it to tip.ini :helmut wrote:I don't like using tip.ini. For Pierre showing/hiding the dialog should be as simple as possible, I'd prefer an extra dialog. Might be a bit annoying for testers, though.
Code: Select all
[gb]
100 = warning dialog text - test
I want also this, as prevention, but some people could still extract it, pack it to non-protected zip and place it to some www sites.helmut wrote:Why not go for the password protected ZIP archive?
And - for most users, password means shareware program, not alpha version of freeware, therefore I think also warning dialog is needed and it's even more important than protected zip archive.
I agree with the popup option.
The password would be very easy to avoid, a simple re-zipping would bring it all to the begining.
Well, I've seen in other programs the start up pop up alert saying "this is a beta version, bla bla bla".
I "vote" for that one
The password would be very easy to avoid, a simple re-zipping would bring it all to the begining.
Well, I've seen in other programs the start up pop up alert saying "this is a beta version, bla bla bla".
I "vote" for that one
Ad decus et ad libertatem nati sumus
Aut haec teneamus aut cum dignitate moriamur
O_o
IMO ZIP password protection is a joke, if you're serious about protecting your alpha and/or beta releases or whatever, use the free GnuPG program and encrypt it:
http://www.gnupg.org/
SHOUT IT FROM THE HILLTOPS: XNVIEW IS THE BEST!
http://www.gnupg.org/
SHOUT IT FROM THE HILLTOPS: XNVIEW IS THE BEST!
Re: O_o
Ohh we have a true hax0r. Since when is 256bit or 128bit encryptions have been baby's job? We are just trying to force the users to understand that they are using unstable release, not to force them to download separate program so they could just get the package open.Anonymous wrote:IMO ZIP password protection is a joke, if you're serious about protecting your alpha and/or beta releases or whatever, use the free GnuPG program and encrypt it:
http://www.gnupg.org/
Wise words... MR. Grim ReaperAokromes wrote:Why no simply change the title of the app from "XnView" to "XnView ''build #'' Alpha"?
XnView Tweak UI - Tool to customize your XnView beyond the regular XnView options.
UI-less Settings - Documentation of all the hidden settings in XnView.
XFAM - Tool to create and customize XnView file associations.
UI-less Settings - Documentation of all the hidden settings in XnView.
XFAM - Tool to create and customize XnView file associations.
Re: O_o
Strongly agree, we are not talking about a real protection, we just want to make people aware that they have a Alpha version. The manual typing of a more or less official password to decrypt it would be sufficient, I think.ckv wrote:Ohh we have a true hax0r. Since when is 256bit or 128bit encryptions have been baby's job? We are just trying to force the users to understand that they are using unstable release, not to force them to download separate program so they could just get the package open.Anonymous wrote:IMO ZIP password protection is a joke, if you're serious about protecting your alpha and/or beta releases or whatever, use the free GnuPG program and encrypt it:
http://www.gnupg.org/
I think that is not be sufficient. Most people should know what an Alpha version is, but there's also many people around who still don't know.ckv wrote:Wise words... MR. Grim ReaperAokromes wrote:Why no simply change the title of the app from "XnView" to "XnView ''build #'' Alpha"?
We agree regarding the password protected ZIP, but I'm not so sure with the dialog. As tester, I don't want to see this dialog at start-up all the time. So there should be a way to disable the dialog.Dreamer wrote:Right, so I think we should use a warning dialog (and password protected zip).
I think for now, we should go for the password protected ZIP. If this does not help, we still could do more about this.