the field below folder thumbs have always been light grey, but with the new betas, they are mostly yellow and sometimes grey. A bug or intentional? The image explains what I mean:
What bugs me most is that some folders have kept their grey, but not all - the reason is still beyond me. Has anybody noticed the same?
Troken wrote:Um... can it be that new folders are classic grey, but as soon as they get a content the turn into yellow (even if you later empty the folder).
Ok, i have that only if the folder is not yet in the DB cache.
Troken wrote:Um... can it be that new folders are classic grey, but as soon as they get a content the turn into yellow (even if you later empty the folder).
Ok, i have that only if the folder is not yet in the DB cache.
Hello Pierre,
Maybe it will be nice also to have, but in a next version (posponed) this possibility for folders too (because this problem has emerged with this change) ?
• Yes, here the BG of the folders (name-label) is light grey as RGB 230 - 230 - 230. The font is red.
- But I didn't add entries beyong the #26.
- That's not the BG of the tree beside either, since it's lighter as RGB 246 -246 -246.
- All entries are not coded as plain or hexa (especially those coming from the interface of the options…)
thus I can't see easily where that colour comes from…
KR
Claude
Clo
Last edited by Clo on Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
oops66 wrote:
->Troken
Has anybody noticed the same?
background folders were configurated in black before, and it's white/grey now on my Computer.
Hi Oops66,
not sure that I follow your question, background folders in black?
Hi Troken
No it's only a suggestion to allow users to chose by themself their background colors folders (name-label), and colors fonts.
Like this new change into this V1.92 for extra suffixes customization:
ColorFilter27=*.avi, 230 0 36
BColorFilter27=*.avi, 60 60 60
Then the colors choise is hope to you.
Last edited by oops66 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
oops66 wrote:
->Troken
Has anybody noticed the same?
background folders were configurated in black before, and it's white/grey now on my Computer.
Hi Oops66,
not sure that I follow your question, background folders in black?
Hi Troken
No it's only a suggestion to allow users to chose by themself their background colors folders (name-label), and colors fonts.
Like this new change into this V1.92 for extra suffixes customization:
ColorFilter27=*.avi, 230 0 36
BColorFilter27=*.avi, 60 60 60
Aha, yes I see. Why not, woudn't hurt, it would allow a lot for anyone who want to cusomize XnView further. Especially if you use unusual formats, it could be great. Hm... giving it more thought, there are many great ways to use it.
Troken wrote:
..., woudn't hurt,... it would allow a lot for anyone who want to cusomize XnView further...
No problems, ...yes !
--> Clo
Clo wrote:...light grey as RGB 230 - 230 - 230...thus I can't see easily where that colour comes from…
Me too...
(on my PC, I have a light grey (Windows 32Bit colors display): RGB 230 230 230 = rgb dec 15132390 = rgb hex E6E6E6
And in (16 Bit) a light grey checkered background
RGB 232 232 232 & RGB 232 228 232 & RGB 224 228 224- but it's normal in 16Bit with some colors)
RGB 230 230 230 probably comes from the source code ( not in the xnview.ini file) ? Pierre ?
Last edited by oops66 on Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
• Remaining in the current frame of the “26-type” entries, you could customize some colours for folders
if you name¦rename them with (a) fancy extension(s)
- For instance : Landscapes.fo1 Babes.fo2
and so on…
- Many standard default entries are rather useless, so it's not penalizing for the common image-types…
KR
Claude
Clo
Old user ON SELECTIVE STRIKE till further notice •
Clo wrote:oops66 Hello !
• Remaining in the current frame of the “26-type” entries, you could customize some colours for folders
if you name¦rename them with (a) fancy extension(s)
- For instance : Landscapes.fo1 Babes.fo2
and so on…
- Many standard default entries are rather useless, so it's not penalizing for the common image-types… KR
Claude
Clo
Hello Clo,
Yes I know, I have already try this for folders with fancy extensions (Folder.###)
But now with this 1.92 it's possible to go higher than 26, and that's works fine.