[solved] poorer quality at zoom factor <>100% (!)

Ask for help and post your question on how to use XnView Classic.

Moderators: XnTriq, xnview

Post Reply
tom*de
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 pm

[solved] poorer quality at zoom factor <>100% (!)

Post by tom*de » Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:51 am

Hello,

I got a few jpg-pictures, made with: Canon EOS 5D Mark III (raw, converted in jpg by Lightroom)

The quality of these pictures shows xnview 2.34 perfect at zoom factor of 100%.
Bigger or smaller zoom factors, i.g. 70% the Pictures have strange ranges on edges and at the transitions.
The smaller the zoom ratio, the worse the quality(!) This is surprising, because a zoom factor less than 100% usually makes minor errors disappear.

Other graphic viewer does not show this effect at these Pictures.

Perhaps an adjustment in Lightroom are, with the xnview not cope? Or an adjustment in xnview, I have to set?
I use XnView for many years and still have not seen anything like it.

What could that be?


i.g.:

X-Auflösung [Pixel/Einheit] : 300
Y-Auflösung [Pixel/Einheit] : 300
Einheit der Auflösung : Zoll
Software/Firmware : Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.3 (Windows)
Belichtungszeit : 1/200
Blende : 8.0
Filmempfindlichkeit (ISO) : 500
Blitz : Ein
Brennweite [mm] : 20
Farbraum : sRGB
X-Auflösung Schärfeebene [Pix/E : 1600
Y-Auflösung Schärfeebene [Pix/E : 1600
Einheit der Auflösung Schärfeeb : cm (3)
Bildbearbeitung : Normal (0)
Kompression : 6
X-Auflösung [Pixel/Einheit] : 72
Y-Auflösung [Pixel/Einheit] : 72
Einheit der Auflösung : Zoll
Miniaturbild-Offset : 922
Miniaturbild-Länge : 16888

Tom
Last edited by tom*de on Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:46 am, edited 2 times in total.

cday
XnThusiast
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:45 am
Location: Cheltenham, U.K.

Re: poorer quality at zoom factor <100 (!)

Post by cday » Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:28 am

Have you tried this setting tom*de :

Tools > Options...
High_quality_zoom.png

tom*de
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 pm

Re: poorer quality at zoom factor <100 (!)

Post by tom*de » Mon Nov 30, 2015 10:22 am

Tanks a lot, cday. It works fine, now. :D

Post Reply