XnView 1.80 for Linux?
Moderators: XnTriq, helmut, xnview
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:26 am
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44922
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
Yes, but i have no free time currently to work on this version...thire wrote:in http://newsgroup.xnview.com/viewtopic.php?t=3666 you, Pierre, anounced that you will start devloppemnt in august 2006. So perhaps you will finish it versus the end of this year? Still very long to go, but XnView is wonderful...
Pierre.
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 10:26 am
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:27 pm
- Location: Estarreja, Portugal
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44922
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:27 pm
- Location: Estarreja, Portugal
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44922
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:14 pm
-
- Author of XnView
- Posts: 44922
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:31 am
- Location: France
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:14 pm
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:46 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:27 pm
- Location: Estarreja, Portugal
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:33 pm
- Location: Oslo
I agree on this:
- Not using Wxwidgets
- Not using Java (I appreciate XnView because it is fast on whatever machine I run it. If it get slower I will probably switch to some other image viewer/batch converter)
- No opinion on the motif/qt choice. If QT makes the cross platforme developpement easier, then go for it
About the importance of the Linux version compared to the Windows one, well I guess that the author of the program should consider a quite important phenomenom: Recently, a lot of people has been considering switching from Windows to either linux (mostly Ubuntu variants ?) or MacOS, mostly because either Vista does not appeal to people (huge hardware requirements, very restrictive licencing scheme).
I've been myself using Windows as my only operating system since about 1996, successfully using 95, 98 OSR2, and Windows 2000 Pro. I use Windows XP at work... and I installed an Ubuntu on my laptop to evaluate the "feasability of switching to Linux seriously).
I have to admit that so far I'm quite impressed by what I saw, it detected all my hardware, works fine, boots and shutdown fast, autoupdate works nicely. The really negative point is that I do not manage to get all my windows applications running on it.
So well, I would be very very happy to find XnView in the "Synaptic" update manager list, because the install scripts are not really the kind of thing I like (I like to just "select/download/get it to install without any question"), and the RPM thing does not work on Ubuntu.
So well in short, if you do such a version, and get it available in the list of installable package for Ubuntu, I can predict a huge number of downloads because the existing picture viewers I checked are really, really crap.
(And XnView is the only one that can display legacy Atari, Oric, Amiga picture formats )
- Not using Wxwidgets
- Not using Java (I appreciate XnView because it is fast on whatever machine I run it. If it get slower I will probably switch to some other image viewer/batch converter)
- No opinion on the motif/qt choice. If QT makes the cross platforme developpement easier, then go for it
About the importance of the Linux version compared to the Windows one, well I guess that the author of the program should consider a quite important phenomenom: Recently, a lot of people has been considering switching from Windows to either linux (mostly Ubuntu variants ?) or MacOS, mostly because either Vista does not appeal to people (huge hardware requirements, very restrictive licencing scheme).
I've been myself using Windows as my only operating system since about 1996, successfully using 95, 98 OSR2, and Windows 2000 Pro. I use Windows XP at work... and I installed an Ubuntu on my laptop to evaluate the "feasability of switching to Linux seriously).
I have to admit that so far I'm quite impressed by what I saw, it detected all my hardware, works fine, boots and shutdown fast, autoupdate works nicely. The really negative point is that I do not manage to get all my windows applications running on it.
So well, I would be very very happy to find XnView in the "Synaptic" update manager list, because the install scripts are not really the kind of thing I like (I like to just "select/download/get it to install without any question"), and the RPM thing does not work on Ubuntu.
So well in short, if you do such a version, and get it available in the list of installable package for Ubuntu, I can predict a huge number of downloads because the existing picture viewers I checked are really, really crap.
(And XnView is the only one that can display legacy Atari, Oric, Amiga picture formats )
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:27 pm
- Location: Estarreja, Portugal
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:05 pm
Re: XnView 1.80 for Linux?
Yes! This will be great! I cant wait! I installed linux (Kubuntu 6.10) on my machine and Im missing XnView from winXP.xnview wrote:No i don't think, but currently i think about a version with QTkarci wrote:Hi,
just wondering if there are some plans to create the Linux version for 1.80... or basically any version that would use GTK 2.